Friday, October 15, 2010
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Brazilian Way Hollywood
Assembly, representation and legitimacy test-tables
I'm too tired to say in general about the university conflict (about which, in summary, I think all parties should do some serious self-criticism) but I will talk about anything in particular I do not want to leave pass.
not bother me that a meeting be declared legitimate representative of the students: no student body more democratic than that in the power, if we are righteous. But for this to be valid, must make room for all students to participate in it.
today denied a student the word, simply by the fact that the PRO . This leads to two observations: 1) by implication, those who did contradict his message that the PRO is equal to the national government, and that those who sympathize with the latter around the world lets them talk. 2) I have no sympathy with either the Government or the PRO, but can still be considered legitimate body representative of the student movement declares that the students are not eligible to participate in it? What fundamentals?
not only the decision itself is questionable (I think I should revert to a point of order as soon as you start the next meeting, authorized to speak to anyone who so desires), the methodology was the dirtiest I saw (in through assemblies that are being cleaned): 25 people voted for the 700 present and almost no one understood what they voted in the midst of crying. (Not true, however, I read that the PRO said on Twitter: the "cast" even though "won the option to let talk" do not let them win.)
level numbers do not make a big difference, because they are literally-8 types. But I did not like a fuck, if not noticed. That
. 
I'm too tired to say in general about the university conflict (about which, in summary, I think all parties should do some serious self-criticism) but I will talk about anything in particular I do not want to leave pass.
not bother me that a meeting be declared legitimate representative of the students: no student body more democratic than that in the power, if we are righteous. But for this to be valid, must make room for all students to participate in it.
today denied a student the word, simply by the fact that the PRO . This leads to two observations: 1) by implication, those who did contradict his message that the PRO is equal to the national government, and that those who sympathize with the latter around the world lets them talk. 2) I have no sympathy with either the Government or the PRO, but can still be considered legitimate body representative of the student movement declares that the students are not eligible to participate in it? What fundamentals?
not only the decision itself is questionable (I think I should revert to a point of order as soon as you start the next meeting, authorized to speak to anyone who so desires), the methodology was the dirtiest I saw (in through assemblies that are being cleaned): 25 people voted for the 700 present and almost no one understood what they voted in the midst of crying. (Not true, however, I read that the PRO said on Twitter: the "cast" even though "won the option to let talk" do not let them win.)
level numbers do not make a big difference, because they are literally-8 types. But I did not like a fuck, if not noticed. That
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)